You're supposed to be discriminating if you ban a comment which is against your blog's rules. An example: You have a blog about Linux and somebody's always comment about how wonderful is Windows. You can't ban it even if it's again the blog's rules. So then you'll have to pay all this amount of money.
I'm not the one who can explain this right now, but if I find exactly this law, I'll try to translate it. What I've seen until now, is that this law is full of contradictions and, what is even better, is that it's based on censorship.
To top it all, there're two more things. The first one is that your blog can be modified in order to protect a possible victim of your discrimination. The second one is that a part of this new law is against Spanish Constitution: the Constitution says you're not guilty until the opposite is proved; the new law says the opposite: you're guilty until the opposite is proved.
To prove your innocence, you have to present what we call a diabolic evidence: you have to prove something has not happened. That, exactly that, is what the Inquisition used to do. I mean, Spain is all right or, as how we say here, ''España va bien''.
I didn't have heard of that law, only the (I'm saying it now, that I'm able, althoun I don't mean it in any bad sense) one referring to faggots and queers.
ReplyDeleteI think politics are tripping, really.
What the hell?!
There's still a better one: making flirtatious comments to a women can cost around 3000€ and a year jailed. I hope they were fakes.
ReplyDelete